Case Detail
CitationPeople v. Anderson,851 N.Y.S.2d 680 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
CrimeUKN
StateNY
Pros. First NameUKN
Pros. Last NameUKN
FederalNo
Trial Year2005
BodyAppeals court
OpinionThe New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division held that prosecutorial misconduct did not warrant new trial: "We are unpersuaded with defendant's claim that pretrial prosecutorial misconduct concerning the failure to timely produce discoverable material, coupled with two prejudicial remarks during summation, warrant a new trial. In each instance of misconduct, County Court properly ameliorated any prejudice to defendant."
Determination Year2008
Misconduct TypePT: Brady
TR: Inflammatory
C/S EffectNo effect
Pros. Misc. ReportedUKN
SanctionsUKN
Sanction TypeUKN
Web linkhttp://www.leagle.com/decision/200894448AD3d896_1233.xml/PEOPLE%20v.%20ANDERSON