Case Detail
CitationPeople v. Glanda, 794 N.Y.S.2d 712 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
CrimeAssault
StateNY
Pros. First NameUKN
Pros. Last NameUKN
FederalNo
Trial Year2001
BodyAppeals court
OpinionThe New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, declined to reverse defendant's assault conviction: "Although during summation the prosecutor labeled the defense expert's testimony as false or fabricated [citations omitted], we conclude that this did not rise to the level requiring reversal [citations omitted], as defendant has failed to establish that the prosecutor's comments, in light of the strength of the trial evidence, in any way prejudiced the jury [citations omitted]."
Determination Year2005
Misconduct TypeT
C/S EffectNo effect
Pros. Misc. ReportedUKN
SanctionsUKN
Sanction TypeUKN
Web linkhttp://www.leagle.com/decision/200597418AD3d956_1273.xml/PEOPLE%20v.%20GLANDA